Low-Fee Online Therapy in Washington State

Low-Fee Online Therapy in Washington State: Solving the Mental Health Access Gap in Suburban and Rural Communities

Washington State faces a paradox when it comes to mental health. The state ranks 6th nationally in the number of mental health providers per capita, with roughly 593 providers per 100,000 residents (America's Health Rankings, 2025). Yet when you look beyond that statewide average, the picture changes dramatically. Nearly half of all Washington counties do not have a single practicing psychiatrist (UW Medicine / Ballmer Group, 2022). Thirty-seven percent of Washingtonians live in areas with a documented shortage of mental health providers, and only 12 percent of residents live in an area where their mental health needs could be expected to be fully met (The Seattle Times, 2021). In the state's designated Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas, only 20.94 percent of the identified need is actually being addressed, and at least 200 additional practitioners would be needed to close that gap (Becker's Behavioral Health, 2026).

These numbers translate into real consequences for real people. Across Washington's suburban communities and rural stretches, residents who need mental health support face long drives, months-long waitlists, or simply no local providers at all. The result is that many people go without care entirely. Nationally, 59.8 percent of adults with mental illness who did not receive treatment said they thought it would cost too much (SAMHSA NSDUH, 2023), and 52 percent of Americans cite affordability as the single greatest barrier to getting mental health care (Gallup, 2024). In Washington, these cost concerns intersect with geographic barriers to create a compounding access crisis that disproportionately affects communities outside the Seattle metro area.

Low-fee online therapy is emerging as one of the most practical solutions to this crisis. By removing both the geographic barrier and the cost barrier simultaneously, telehealth counseling services are reaching Washingtonians who were previously locked out of care. This post examines the scope of Washington's mental health access gap across all 39 counties, the research supporting online therapy as an effective alternative, and how low-fee models are making a measurable difference for suburban and rural residents across the state.

The Scope of Washington's Mental Health Crisis

To understand why online therapy matters so much in Washington, it helps to understand how widespread the need is. Washington ranked 35th out of 51 (50 states plus the District of Columbia) in Mental Health America's 2025 overall mental health ranking, reflecting both higher-than-average mental illness prevalence and significant gaps in care. Approximately 22 percent of Washington adults experience a mental illness in a given year, compared to 19 percent nationally (Mental Health America / The Seattle Times, 2021). An estimated 1 in 5 Washington residents has a diagnosable mental health disorder (Mental Health America / The Seattle Times, 2022). The state also ranks among those with the highest rates of anxiety in the nation, alongside Oregon and Missouri (MoneyGeek, 2024).

The challenges extend to young people as well. In 2022, 58 percent of Washington youth with major depression did not receive any mental health treatment (Mental Health America, 2023). The state faces what the Washington State Health Care Authority has described as a severe shortage of child and adolescent psychiatrists, with less than 1 percent of children attending school districts that meet recommended student-to-school-psychologist or student-to-counselor ratios (Health Care Authority, 2024). While Washington was one of only five states to show a statistically significant decrease in youth major depressive episodes between 2021 and 2023 (Mental Health America, 2025), the overall picture remains one of substantial unmet need.

On the workforce side, the situation is strained. In 2022, 74 percent of community behavioral health agencies in Washington limited or closed programs because they could not fill positions (Washington Council for Behavioral Health, 2023). The vacancy rate for behavioral health professionals with advanced degrees reached 29 percent, with a turnover rate of 32 percent. These shortages hit hardest in areas that were already underserved, creating a cycle where the communities that need the most help have the fewest resources available. For anyone looking for affordable sliding scale therapy in Washington, understanding these access barriers is the first step toward finding real solutions.

A County-by-County Look at the Access Gap

Washington's 39 counties span an extraordinary range of geography, population density, and mental health infrastructure. The statewide provider-to-population ratio is approximately 250 residents per provider, which sounds manageable until you realize how unevenly those providers are distributed. Several rural counties, including Douglas, Lincoln, and Garfield, have provider ratios more than double the national average of 380 to 1 (The Seattle Times, 2021). In practical terms, this means a resident of Garfield County in southeastern Washington or Wahkiakum County along the Columbia River may have no local therapist available at all.

The geographic distribution breaks down into several distinct regions, each with its own access profile.

In the Puget Sound Metro Region, which includes King, Pierce, Snohomish, Kitsap, and Thurston counties, the concentration of providers is highest. Seattle, Tacoma, Bellevue, Olympia, and Everett have more therapists per capita than nearly anywhere else in the state. However, even here, waitlists are common, cost remains a significant barrier, and suburban communities on the outer edges of these counties often have far fewer options than the urban cores. A resident of rural south Pierce County or east Snohomish County may face the same practical access challenges as someone in a much more remote part of the state.

In Eastern Washington, the picture is considerably more difficult. Spokane County serves as a regional hub, but surrounding counties like Stevens, Ferry, Pend Oreille, Lincoln, Adams, and Whitman counties have dramatically fewer providers. Ferry County, with a population of roughly 7,500, and Garfield County, with fewer than 2,300 residents, are among the most underserved areas in the state. For residents of communities like Republic, Colville, or Pomeroy, the nearest therapist may be an hour or more away by car, assuming one is accepting new clients at all.

The North Central Region, including Chelan, Douglas, Okanogan, and Grant counties, presents similar challenges. Wenatchee and Moses Lake serve as small regional centers, but Okanogan County, the state's largest county by land area, has very limited provider availability spread across an enormous geographic footprint. A resident of Omak or Twisp may face a two-hour drive to reach a therapist in Wenatchee, and even then, availability is not guaranteed.

Southwest Washington, including Clark, Cowlitz, Skamania, Klickitat, and Wahkiakum counties, benefits somewhat from proximity to the Portland, Oregon metro area. Vancouver and its suburbs in Clark County have reasonable provider density, but Wahkiakum County, one of the state's least populated, has almost no local mental health infrastructure. Cowlitz County and Klickitat County fall somewhere in between, with limited options concentrated in Longview, Kelso, and Goldendale.

The Olympic Peninsula and Coastal Region, including Clallam, Jefferson, Grays Harbor, Pacific, and Mason counties, faces significant access barriers compounded by geographic isolation. Port Angeles, Sequim, and Aberdeen serve as modest service centers, but many communities on the peninsula are remote, and the combination of long travel distances and limited providers creates a particularly acute gap. Pacific County, with a population under 22,000, is among the state's most underserved areas for mental health care.

In the South Central Region, Yakima, Kittitas, and Benton and Franklin counties present a mixed picture. The Tri-Cities area (Kennewick, Richland, and Pasco) and the city of Yakima have some provider availability, but outlying communities in Kittitas County and rural Yakima County have very limited access. Ellensburg is the main center for Kittitas County, while the agricultural communities throughout the Yakima Valley often have few options, compounded by language barriers for Spanish-speaking residents.

The Northwest Region, including Whatcom, Skagit, Island, and San Juan counties, benefits from Bellingham's university community and proximity to the larger Puget Sound corridor. However, San Juan County, accessible only by ferry or small aircraft, faces unique isolation challenges. Skagit and Island counties have moderate provider availability in communities like Mount Vernon, Anacortes, and Oak Harbor, but rural areas between these towns have gaps.

Finally, Washington's central agricultural counties, including Walla Walla, Columbia, Asotin, and Franklin counties, round out the access picture. Walla Walla has a small but present provider community, partly thanks to Whitman College, but Columbia County (population roughly 4,000) and Asotin County have minimal mental health infrastructure. These are communities where a single provider retiring or relocating can eliminate the only local option overnight.

The following table summarizes key mental health access and prevalence data for Washington State, illustrating why low-fee online therapy has become such a critical resource.

Indicator	Washington State	National Average or Context
Overall mental health ranking (MHA 2025)	35th out of 51	Lower rank = worse outcomes
Adult mental illness prevalence	~22%	~19% nationally (23.4% in 2024 SAMHSA data)
Residents in provider shortage areas	37%	122 million Americans in shortage areas nationally
Counties without a psychiatrist	Nearly half (of 39)	N/A
Mental health providers per 100K	593 (ranked 6th)	National average: ~340:1 ratio
Shortage area need met	20.94%	27.29% nationally
Provider-to-population ratio (statewide)	~250:1	~340:1 nationally
Rural county ratios (Douglas, Lincoln, Garfield)	More than double the national average	National average: 380:1
Youth with major depression untreated (2022)	58%	N/A
Behavioral health agencies limiting programs (2022)	74%	N/A
BH professional vacancy rate (2022)	29%	N/A
BH professional turnover rate (2022)	32%	N/A
Cost cited as top barrier to care	52% (national Gallup survey)	59.8% of those with mental illness who skipped care (SAMHSA)

Sources: Mental Health America (2025), America's Health Rankings (2025), The Seattle Times (2021), UW Medicine / Ballmer Group (2022), Washington Council for Behavioral Health (2023), SAMHSA NSDUH (2023), Gallup (2024), Becker's Behavioral Health (2026), Washington State Health Care Authority (2024).

How Online Therapy Is Closing the Gap

Telehealth has transformed from a niche experiment into a mainstream mode of mental health care delivery. Mental health is now the most common reason people use telehealth nationally, accounting for 68.9 percent of all telehealth claims in April 2024 (FAIR Health, 2024). According to the American Psychological Association's 2024 Practitioner Pulse Survey, 88 percent of psychologists now use telehealth in their practice, with 19 percent practicing fully remotely and 69 percent in hybrid mode. Among those using telehealth, 96 percent agree that it has proven its worth as a therapeutic tool.

The research on effectiveness is clear. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials involving 931 patients found no significant differences in symptom severity between telehealth and face-to-face psychotherapy immediately after treatment or at 3, 6, or 12 month follow-ups (JMIR Mental Health, 2022). Working alliance, client satisfaction, and functional outcomes were also equivalent. A separate meta-analysis of 154 randomized controlled trials found that guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy maintains its effects at follow-ups of 12 months or longer, alleviating symptoms of anxiety, depression, insomnia, and PTSD (Clinical Psychology Review, 2024). In a large study of 35 million telehealth visits across 180 hospitals and clinics, mental health had the lowest rate of requiring in-person follow-up, with only 15 percent of mental health patients needing a face-to-face visit within three months (Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2023).

For Washington specifically, these findings carry particular weight. The state formally authorized teletherapy through House Bill 1286, effective in 2022. The Washington Department of Health's 2023 Telehealth Report recognized that telehealth had evolved from a fringe service with low utilization into a generally accepted means for people to access care. This policy framework, combined with Washington's geographic reality, makes the state one of the places where online therapy has the greatest potential to address unmet need.

The advantages for suburban and rural Washingtonians are concrete and immediate. A resident of Omak in Okanogan County no longer needs to drive two hours to Wenatchee for a therapy appointment. A single parent in Pacific County does not have to arrange childcare and lose a half day of work to travel to the nearest provider. A farmworker in the Yakima Valley can attend a session during a lunch break from a private space on their phone. A college student in Pullman who cannot find a local therapist accepting new clients can access care from their apartment. These are not hypothetical scenarios. They represent the daily reality that online therapy is changing across Washington's communities, and Sentio Counseling Washington's online therapy services are specifically designed to address these barriers for residents across all 39 counties.

Why "Low-Fee" Matters as Much as "Online"

Removing the geographic barrier through telehealth is necessary but not sufficient. If a therapy session costs $200, a resident of Ferry County who can now access it via video is still effectively locked out if they cannot afford the fee. This is where the cost dimension becomes critical.

The average cost of a therapy session nationally is approximately $139 as of 2024, according to SimplePractice data drawn from nearly 105 million sessions (SimplePractice, 2025). That figure reflects a mix of insurance-covered and self-pay sessions. For someone paying out of pocket in Washington, full-fee sessions with a licensed therapist typically range from $150 to $250 per session. Over the course of weekly therapy, that amounts to $600 to $1,000 per month, a cost that puts consistent care out of reach for a significant portion of the population.

The data confirms that cost is the dominant barrier. In a 2024 Gallup survey of 2,266 adults, 52 percent identified affordability as the top barrier to obtaining mental health treatment, outranking every other obstacle including difficulty finding a provider, which was cited by 42 percent. Among adults with any mental illness who sought or considered seeking treatment but did not receive it, 59.8 percent said they thought it would cost too much (SAMHSA NSDUH, 2023). The share of U.S. adults going without mental health care specifically due to cost rose from 4 percent in 2021 to 7 percent in 2024, according to Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker data using CDC NHIS figures.

Low-fee therapy models address this directly. Sliding scale practices in Washington State adjust fees based on what clients can afford, with some requiring income documentation and others using an honor system. The honor-system approach is particularly valuable because it eliminates the logistical hassle and discomfort of proving your financial situation, which can itself become a barrier to seeking help. For people whose income fluctuates, such as gig workers, seasonal employees, freelancers, or anyone navigating a job transition, not having to produce pay stubs or tax returns makes accessing care significantly easier.

Sentio Counseling Washington combines both elements. Individual therapy sessions start at $30 and couples therapy starts at $45, with fees set on an honor-system sliding scale that requires no income verification. These rates are among the lowest offered by any professional therapy practice in Washington, well below the $40 to $85 starting fees found at most other sliding scale practices in the state. The combination of statewide telehealth coverage and genuinely low fees means that a resident of any of Washington's 39 counties can access professional therapy at a price they can manage, without needing to drive hours to reach a provider's office.

What This Looks Like in Practice: A Case Example

Note: The following case example is a composite. All identifying details have been modified to protect client privacy. No real client's information is disclosed here.

Consider Maria, a 34-year-old administrative assistant living in a small town in central Washington. She had been experiencing worsening anxiety for over a year, including difficulty sleeping, persistent worry about finances, and increasing withdrawal from social activities she used to enjoy. Maria knew she wanted help but felt stuck. The nearest therapist accepting new clients was in a city over an hour away, and with two children in school and a job that offered no flexibility for midday appointments, making that drive regularly was not realistic. She had looked into therapy before but found that the therapists available in her area charged $175 to $200 per session, which was far beyond what her family's budget could support.

When Maria learned about low-fee online therapy options available statewide, she was skeptical at first. She wondered whether therapy over video could really work, and she worried that a lower fee might mean lower quality care. After reading about the research showing that online therapy produces outcomes comparable to in-person treatment, she decided to try it.

Maria was matched with a therapist who conducted sessions via secure video from a home office. The therapist was a graduate trainee at Sentio University, receiving weekly individual supervision, weekly group supervision, and weekly Deliberate Practice skills training, all of it video-reviewed by licensed clinical supervisors. Maria's sliding scale fee was set at $35 per session based on what she could comfortably afford, with no paperwork required to verify her income.

Over the course of several months, Maria's anxiety decreased measurably. Her therapist used Routine Outcome Monitoring at every session to track her progress, and when the data suggested that one approach was not producing the expected improvement, the therapist and supervisor adjusted the treatment plan. Maria began sleeping better, re-engaged with friends and community activities, and reported feeling more capable of managing her worry when it arose. She attended every session from her kitchen table after her children left for school, never needing to take time off work or arrange childcare.

Maria's experience reflects a pattern documented in the research. Seventy-five percent of telehealth patients report that their visits are as good as in-person care (Spaulding et al., Telemedicine and e-Health, 2024), and 94 percent of telehealth users say they would use it again (J.D. Power, 2023). For people in suburban and rural communities who face the double barrier of distance and cost, this combination of accessible format and affordable pricing is often the difference between getting help and going without.

Quality of Care in Low-Fee Online Therapy

A reasonable concern about low-fee therapy is whether reduced cost comes with reduced quality. The evidence suggests it does not, particularly when the low-fee model is paired with rigorous training and clinical accountability structures.

Research on therapist effectiveness has consistently shown that a therapist's relational skills have more than ten times the impact on therapy outcomes than their choice of a therapeutic model or adherence to a specific technique (Rousmaniere, 2019, citing Wampold and Imel, 2015). What matters most is not the price of the session or even the therapist's years of experience, but whether the therapist can form a genuine working relationship with the client and adapt skillfully to what the client needs. In fact, research has found that years of clinical experience bear little to no relation to a therapist's effectiveness (Goldberg et al., 2016; Wampold and Brown, 2005).

This finding has profound implications for training-clinic models, where graduate student therapists provide care at lower fees under intensive supervision. When the supervision is genuinely rigorous and focused on building specific clinical skills rather than just discussing cases conceptually, trainees can achieve strong outcomes with their clients. As Tony Rousmaniere, PsyD, President of Sentio University and co-editor of the APA Essentials of Deliberate Practice book series, and Alexandre Vaz, PhD, Chief Academic Officer of Sentio University, have written: "Training effective psychotherapists requires more than just classroom instruction; it demands an integration of practical experience with theoretical learning" (Rousmaniere and Vaz, 2025). At Sentio, roughly half of every class session is dedicated to active skills training through behavioral rehearsal, rather than traditional lecture-based instruction (Rousmaniere and Vaz, 2025).

The Sentio Supervision Model integrates routine outcome monitoring, video review of therapy sessions, and Deliberate Practice behavioral rehearsal into a structured 50-minute supervision hour. A peer-reviewed case study published in the Journal of Clinical Psychology described how this model produced measurable improvement in both a first-year trainee's clinical skills and the client's distress levels over a nine-session course of treatment (Brand, Miller-Bottome, Vaz, and Rousmaniere, 2025). Hanna Levenson, PsyD, a psychotherapy training expert who has taught more than two thousand graduate students over a career spanning more than 40 years, observed these supervision meetings firsthand and noted that supervisees genuinely appreciate direct corrective feedback when it is delivered within this structured model (Levenson, 2024).

This level of clinical accountability is not the norm at most therapy practices, regardless of price. Many experienced therapists in private practice, charging $200 or more per session, receive no ongoing supervision, do not use outcome monitoring tools, and have no structured method for identifying and improving their clinical skills. The low fee at a practice like Sentio Counseling Washington reflects the trainee status of its therapists, not a reduction in the quality of the clinical system supporting them.

Getting Started: Online Therapy Across All 39 Washington Counties

If you live in Washington State and have been putting off therapy because of cost, distance, or both, low-fee online therapy may be the path that finally makes it possible. The combination of telehealth access and sliding scale pricing means that residents of Adams, Asotin, Benton, Chelan, Clallam, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Douglas, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lewis, Lincoln, Mason, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Spokane, Stevens, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Whitman, and Yakima counties can access care from wherever they are, as long as they have an internet connection and a private space.

Starting is straightforward. You visit the sign-up page, complete a brief intake form, and a member of the team will contact you within one to two business days. You will discuss what brings you to therapy, your scheduling preferences, and your financial situation. Together, you will determine a session fee that fits your budget, and you will be matched with a therapist based on your needs and goals. Most clients begin therapy within one to two weeks of their initial inquiry.

Sessions are conducted via secure, HIPAA-compliant video through an encrypted version of Zoom. All you need is a device with a camera, a stable internet connection, and a private space where you can speak freely. Whether you are sitting at your kitchen table in Ellensburg, in a parked car during a lunch break in Yakima, or in your living room in Port Angeles, the therapy is the same: professional, evidence-informed, and supported by the same intensive supervision and outcome monitoring that defines the Sentio model.

Washington's telehealth parity law (HB 1286, effective 2022) has created a supportive policy environment for online therapy, and the state Department of Health has recognized telehealth as a generally accepted means for people to access care. The infrastructure is in place. The research supports it. The barriers of distance and cost no longer need to be the reasons you go without the help you deserve.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is online therapy really as effective as meeting with a therapist in person?

Yes. Multiple large meta-analyses have found no significant differences in outcomes between telehealth and face-to-face psychotherapy for depression, anxiety, and other common mental health conditions. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials found equivalent results at immediate post-treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups (JMIR Mental Health, 2022). A separate analysis of 154 RCTs found that internet-delivered CBT maintains its therapeutic effects at follow-ups of a year or longer (Clinical Psychology Review, 2024).

How can therapy sessions starting at $30 be high quality?

The low fee reflects the fact that therapists at training clinics like Sentio Counseling Washington are graduate students, not that the quality of care is lower. Sentio's therapists receive weekly individual supervision, weekly group supervision, and weekly Deliberate Practice skills training, all of which is video-reviewed. The practice uses Routine Outcome Monitoring at every session with every client, which means therapists and their supervisors are continuously tracking whether treatment is working. Research has shown that this kind of intensive, outcome-focused training model produces meaningful clinical results (Brand et al., 2025; Goldberg et al., 2016).

Do I need insurance to use Sentio Counseling Washington?

No. Sentio's sliding scale fees are paid out of pocket, with no insurance required. If you do have insurance with out-of-network benefits, Sentio provides superbills that you can submit to your insurer for potential reimbursement. You can learn more about therapy options with and without insurance on our blog post about sliding scale therapy in Washington State.

Can I access online therapy from anywhere in Washington?

Yes. As long as you are physically located in Washington State during your session, you can participate from any of the state's 39 counties. All you need is a device with a camera, a stable internet connection, and a private space where you can speak openly.

What conditions can online therapy help with?

Online therapy is effective for a wide range of concerns, including anxiety, depression, trauma, grief, relationship difficulties, life transitions, stress management, self-esteem, and more. Research supports telehealth for treating generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, adjustment disorders, ADHD, and PTSD, which together account for the vast majority of telehealth mental health diagnoses nationally (FAIR Health, 2024).

References

America's Health Rankings / United Health Foundation. (2025). Explore mental health providers in Washington. https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/measures/MHP/WA

Brand, J., Miller-Bottome, M., Vaz, A., & Rousmaniere, T. (2025). Deliberate Practice Supervision in Action: The Sentio Supervision Model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23790

FAIR Health. (2024). Monthly Telehealth Regional Tracker, April 2024. Reported by TechTarget. https://www.techtarget.com/virtualhealthcare/news/366596527/Telehealth-use-rose-27-nationally-in-April-but-fell-in-3-US-regions

Gallup. (2024). Americans perceive gaps in mental, physical healthcare. https://news.gallup.com/poll/644144/americans-perceive-gaps-mental-physical-healthcare.aspx

Goldberg, S. B., Babins-Wagner, R., Rousmaniere, T., Berzins, S., Hoyt, W. T., Whipple, J. L., Miller, S. D., & Wampold, B. E. (2016). Creating a climate for therapist improvement: A case study of an agency focused on outcomes and deliberate practice. Psychotherapy, 53(3), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000060

HRSA Bureau of Health Workforce. (2026). Mental healthcare provider gaps, by state. Reported by Becker's Behavioral Health. https://www.beckersbehavioralhealth.com/behavioral-health-mental-health/mental-healthcare-provider-gaps-by-state/

J.D. Power. (2023). U.S. Telehealth Satisfaction Study. https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2023-us-telehealth-satisfaction-study

JMIR Mental Health. (2022). Telehealth versus face-to-face psychotherapy for less common mental health conditions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8956990/

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. (2023). Overview of telehealth in the United States since the COVID-19 public health emergency. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10364039/

Levenson, H. (2024). What deliberate practice supervision has to offer traditional supervision: Nine take-home messages. Psychotherapy Bulletin, 59(3), 55-59. https://societyforpsychotherapy.org/what-deliberate-practice-supervision-has-to-offer-traditional-supervision-nine-take-home-messages/

Mental Health America. (2025). Ranking the states: 2025 State of Mental Health in America. https://mhanational.org/the-state-of-mental-health-in-america/data-rankings/ranking-the-states/

MoneyGeek. (2024). Best (and worst) states for mental health access and cost. https://www.moneygeek.com/living/healthcare/best-states-for-mental-health-services/

Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker. (2026). How does cost affect access to healthcare? https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/cost-affect-access-care/

Clinical Psychology Review. (2024). Do the effects of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (i-CBT) last after a year and beyond? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272735824001399

Rousmaniere, T. (2019). Mastering the inner skills of psychotherapy: A deliberate practice manual. Gold Lantern Press. ISBN: 978-1-7325657-0-8. https://www.amazon.com/Mastering-Inner-Skills-Psychotherapy-Deliberate/dp/1732565708

Rousmaniere, T., & Vaz, A. (2025). Sentio's clinic-to-classroom method: Bridging deliberate practice and clinical training. Psychotherapy Bulletin, 60(2), 79-84. https://societyforpsychotherapy.org/sentios-clinic-to-classroom-methodbridging-deliberate-practice-and-clinical-training/

SAMHSA. (2023). National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Reported by Mental Health America, 2025 State of Mental Health in America. https://mhanational.org/the-state-of-mental-health-in-america/data-rankings/access-to-care/

The Seattle Times. (2021). Access to mental health care is lacking in Washington's rural corners. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/mental-health/access-to-mental-health-care-is-lacking-in-washingtons-rural-corners-heres-how-people-are-finding-help/

SimplePractice. (2025). The average cost of therapy in America by state. https://www.simplepractice.com/blog/average-therapy-session-rate-by-state/

Spaulding, E. M., et al. (2024). Patient satisfaction with telehealth visits. Telemedicine and e-Health. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38452337/

UW Medicine / Ballmer Group. (2022). A quarter of WA residents don't have access to mental health services. https://give.uwmedicine.org/stories/a-quarter-of-wa-residents-dont-have-access-to-mental-health-services/

Washington Council for Behavioral Health. (2023). Investment in behavioral health is long overdue in Washington State. Reported by Spokane Journal of Business. https://www.spokanejournal.com/articles/8-guest-commentary-investment-in-behavioral-health-is-long-overdue-in-washington-state

Washington State Department of Health. (2023). 2023 Telehealth Report. https://doh.wa.gov/public-health-provider-resources/telehealth/2023-telehealth-report

Washington State Health Care Authority. (2024). Access to behavioral health services for children, youth, and young adults. https://www.hca.wa.gov/assets/program/access-bh-svcs-children-leg-report-20240206.pdf

About the Authors

Tony Rousmaniere, PsyD is the President of Sentio University and Executive Director of the Sentio Counseling Center and Sentio Counseling Washington. He is Past-President of the psychotherapy division of the American Psychological Association and the author of over 20 books on deliberate practice and psychotherapy training, including The Essentials of Deliberate Practice book series (APA Books). He is a licensed psychologist in California and Washington. Learn more

Alexandre Vaz, PhD is the Chief Academic Officer of Sentio University and cofounder of the Deliberate Practice Institute. He is co-editor of The Essentials of Deliberate Practice book series (APA Books) and the author of over a dozen books on deliberate practice and psychotherapy training. Dr. Vaz is the founder and host of Psychotherapy Expert Talks. He is a licensed clinical psychologist in Portugal. Learn more